Overview

Architecture

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

25.3

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

26.2 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

52.5 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is poor, 26.2%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

Architecture

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 6.0 5.2 6.5 7.3 4.7 7.6 3.0 40.3 34.2% 0.5
Article, other NA NA 1.0 3.5 0.5 2.0 NA 7.0 0.0% 0.1
Conference paper, peer review 1.5 4.5 0.1 4.3 1.0 7.3 2.5 21.3 11.0% 0.5
Conference paper, other 12.0 11.3 9.0 11.0 11.5 7.8 NA 62.7 0.0% 0.0
Book 1.0 NA 1.3 0.3 NA 1.5 NA 4.2 12.0% 0.1
Anthology (editor) 1.0 NA NA 3.3 NA 0.7 3.2 8.2 0.0% 0.0
Chapter in book 6.3 3.7 5.8 14.2 26.0 13.5 11.7 81.2 0.0% 0.1
Article, book review 1.0 NA NA NA NA 1.0 3.0 5.0 60.0% 0.0
Proceeding (editor) NA 0.5 NA NA NA NA NA 0.5 0.0% 0.0
Report NA 1.9 1.3 0.5 NA 2.0 NA 5.8 0.0% 0.0
Doctoral thesis NA NA 1.0 2.0 2.0 NA 2.0 7.0 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 8 6 7 11 7 9 5 53 43.4% 1
Article, other NA NA 1 5 1 2 NA 9 0.0% 0
Conference paper, peer review 2 7 1 6 2 10 3 31 9.7% 1
Conference paper, other 12 12 9 11 13 10 NA 67 0.0% 0
Book 1 NA 2 1 NA 2 NA 6 16.7% 0
Anthology (editor) 1 NA NA 5 NA 2 6 14 0.0% 0
Chapter in book 7 5 7 18 27 16 13 93 0.0% 0
Article, book review 1 NA NA NA NA 1 3 5 60.0% 0
Proceeding (editor) NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA 1 0.0% 0
Report NA 6 2 1 NA 2 NA 11 0.0% 0
Doctoral thesis NA NA 1 2 2 NA 2 7 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

Architecture

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 2.4 1.5 0.6 1.2 49.0%
2015 2.2 1.8 0.8 1.0 44.4%
2016 3.0 1.0 0.3 2.0 66.7%
2017 2.3 4.7 2.0 1.5 64.3%
2018 1.7 6.0 3.5 1.0 58.8%
Total 11.7 14.9 1.3 6.7 57.1%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 6.7 0.55 0.1 1.9%
2015-2017 6.6 0.56 0.1 1.9%
2016-2018 6.0 0.71 0.2 2.8%
2017-2019 5.6 0.80 0.2 3.0%
Total 12.3 0.67 0.3 2.4%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 3 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 20%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 9 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 33.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

Architecture

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 6.7 0.87 0.4 5.4%
2015-2017 6.6 0.83 0.8 11.4%
2016-2018 7.0 0.90 0.7 9.5%
2017-2019 6.6 1.08 1.9 29.4%
2018-2020 4.7 1.17 1.4 30.5%
Total 13.8 0.98 2.3 16.8%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 9 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 31.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

Architecture

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 9 1 11.1% 0 0.0%
2015-2017 9 0 0.0% 2 22.2%
2016-2018 11 1 9.1% 3 27.3%
2017-2019 12 1 8.3% 4 33.3%
2018-2020 10 1 10.0% 3 30.0%
Total 23 2 8.7% 5 21.7%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 9 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 37.5%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Chile 1 1 0 0 0 1.0
United Kingdom 3 2 1 0 0 0.5
South Africa 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Indonesia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
France 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Portugal 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Stockholm University University Sweden 5 5 0 0 0 2.2
Chalmers University of Technology University Sweden 5 4 1 0 0 1.4
University College of Art, Craft and Design University College Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 1.2
Pontifical Catholic University of Chile University Chile 1 1 0 0 0 1.0
University of Cape Town University South Africa 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Texas at Austin University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Karolinska Institutet University Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
2BK Arkitekter Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts University Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Umeå University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Northumbria at Newcastle University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Mälardalen University College University College Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University College London University United Kingdom 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Bandung Institute of Technology (ITB) University Indonesia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Stockholms läns landsting Other health services Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Swedish Work Environment Authority Other Public Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Gävle University College University College Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Imperial College London University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Trilateral Res NA United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Univ Arts University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
UNIV PARIS 09 NA France 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Edinburgh University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Delft University of Technology University Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Gothenburg University Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Porto University Portugal 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Open Access

Architecture

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 6 1 1 0 0 0 5 16.7%
2015 3 1 1 0 0 0 2 33.3%
2016 5 2 2 0 0 0 3 40.0%
2017 13 5 2 1 2 0 8 38.5%
2018 5 3 2 1 0 0 2 60.0%
2019 10 6 2 2 2 0 4 60.0%
2020 3 1 0 1 0 0 2 33.3%
Total 45 19 10 5 4 0 26 42.2%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

Architecture

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 2.4 6.6 2.7 0.0 0.0%
2015 5.2 14.5 2.8 3.1 60.1%
2016 3.6 11.5 3.2 1.1 31.4%
2017 9.0 22.0 2.4 6.0 66.7%
2018 3.7 15.2 4.1 1.0 27.0%
2019 6.8 14.6 2.1 4.2 62.1%
2020 1.5 2.1 1.4 1.0 68.6%
Total 32.3 86.6 2.7 16.5 51.2%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 4 (full counted) publications with poor Scopus coverage (at least 32.9%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 10.2 0.64 0.2 2.5%
2015-2017 14.4 0.64 0.8 5.2%
2016-2018 13.4 0.81 0.9 6.5%
2017-2019 15.5 0.77 1.0 6.2%
Total 25.6 0.72 1.2 4.7%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 17 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 47.5%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 9.2 0.56 1.2 13.6%
2015-2017 11.4 0.62 1.8 15.3%
2016-2018 10.9 0.81 1.9 17.2%
2017-2019 10.0 1.22 4.5 44.8%
2018-2020 5.7 1.78 4.4 76.8%
Total 19.6 0.94 6.2 31.4%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 17 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 47.5%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 17 0 0.0% 2 11.8%
2015-2017 27 0 0.0% 4 14.8%
2016-2018 26 0 0.0% 6 23.1%
2017-2019 30 1 3.3% 7 23.3%
2018-2020 19 2 10.5% 6 31.6%
Total 50 2 4.0% 10 20.0%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 17 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 54.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row